Comments on: The “P” in PR Should Stand for “People”

By: Find awesome jobs in Minnesota » Blog Archive » Integrated Marketing and Communications AND the PR Industry: Five Questions with Beth Harte

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:07:36 +0000

[...] Honestly, I don’t see PR pros moving the needle on IMC until they get back to their roots of people relations. I see many PR agencies, consultants and professionals using social media channels to push [...]

By: Never Mind the P, Just Get the Relations Part Right

Never Mind the P, Just Get the Relations Part Right — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:03:51 +0000

[...] solid PR folks like David Mullen suggest it should be People Relations, as does online marketer and social media guy Ari Herzog in a post from earlier this year. Often [...]

By: People Relations: New Services & Platforms Demand Amalgamation, Not Evolution, of Industries « Legends of Aerocles

Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:33:43 +0000

[...] far as I understand it) People Relations, resultant of a discussion with Shannon Paul. The post, The “P” in PR Should Stand for “People” is an enlightening one and hits on some very interesting and very true points about today’s [...]

By: PR: What Can We Do Better « Legends of Aerocles

PR: What Can We Do Better « Legends of Aerocles — Thu, 07 May 2009 21:32:16 +0000

[...] And Check out this post by David Mullen in which he Coins the Term ‘People Relations’ – Brought to you by @Dmullen @Ariherzog @shannonpaul & @missusp - The “P” in PR Should Stand for “People” [...]

By: What's In a Name or Why Pigeonholing an Industry Doesn't Always Work | danny brown

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:30:00 +0000

[...] are questioning what PR stands for – some say it’s people relations, while others say we shouldn’t be calling it public relations any [...]

By: Modern PR: The Next Wave | soloprpro.com

Modern PR: The Next Wave | soloprpro.com — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:56:49 +0000

[...] media relations, we now must look at employing all the methods available for communicating with the people who make up our publics. We must no longer think in terms of “hits,” audiences, and eyeballs, [...]

By: prSPEAK.com » Blog Archive » Email and phone calls and Facebook - oh my!

Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:17:35 +0000

[...] to focus on the task at hand, it could be a valid concern. As marketers, it’s a necessity to participate participate participate, including the involvement in as many social networks as possible, engaging [...]

By: Five PR Trend Predictions for 2009 « Fredzimny’s Blog

Five PR Trend Predictions for 2009 « Fredzimny’s Blog — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:09:31 +0000

[...] Relations – I’ve said it before. I think the P in PR is changing from “Public” to “People.” We’ve always targeted publics [...]

By: Danny Brown

Danny Brown — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:15:51 +0000

I think, at its core, PR has always been about the people:

* The client
* The audience
* The media

The problem is the view that many PR people take – “we know best so we won’t listen to other views.”

This is what needs to change – stop being dinosaurs with an ego problem, join the real world and get back to listening as much as you talk.

In short – RELATE.

Nice post, David, as usual

By: PR 3.0 - Do You Have the Skills to Compete? « Social Media Snippets

PR 3.0 - Do You Have the Skills to Compete? « Social Media Snippets — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:56 +0000

[...] breaks down into media relations, blogger relations and consumer relations. On a similar note, David Mullen did a great post on how “public relations” has really been redefined as “people [...]